ia: Benvenite! In mi blog io scribe in interlingua, italiano e anglese.

it: Benvenuti! Nel mio blog scrivo in interlingua, italiano e inglese.

en: Welcome! In my blog I write in Interlingua, Italian and English.

The Lego Movie 2, un surprisa positive

Heri io e mi sponsa ha accompaniate mi filios al cinema, pro guardar le film "The Lego Movie 2". Isto es un film de animation tridimensional que, como le titulo suggere, narra le aventuras de nostre amate minifiguras Lego.

Le trailer del version italian del film

Il es possibile que isto sia causate da mi basse expectationes, ma io confessa que le film me placeva multo, e in alicun momentos esseva multo plus profunde de altere filmes mirate a un publico plus adulte. E a iste puncto io vos consilia de stoppar le lectura de iste entrata, si vos plana de guardar le film: io va revelar alicun partes del historia, e si vos non vole que vostre surprisa sia guastate, stoppa de leger me hic.

(A iste puncto uno poterea demandar se qual es le senso de parlar vos de iste film, viste que illo obviemente non es interessante pro vos; ma io non va poner me iste question, e continua.)

Lo que plus me colpava es un drammatic colpo de scena (inexpectate inversion del eventos) que mirabilemente presenta un confusion del conceptos de bon e perfide: in breve, isto occurre quando Emmet, le protagonista, es sur le puncto de liberar su amate Lucy e altere su amicos qui esseva captivate per le folle e perfide habitantes de un planeta lontan. Il es in iste momento, que Lucy comprende que illes non del toto es folle e perfide, ma sinceremente amicabile; illa comprende que illa esseva victima de un mal comprension causate per su prejudicios, e alora illa cerca, inutilemente, de convincer Emmet a abandonar su plano de destruction de iste population extra-terrestre.

Iste momento es terribilemente actual, mesmo in le terminologia usate, quando Emmet accusa Lucy de haber essite le victima de un lavage del cerebro (anglese: brainwashing) que la impedi de vider le realitate, sin realisar que il es proprio ille, le qui ha un vision completemente distorte del realitate e ha totalmente invertite le conceptos de ben e mal.

Iste passage ben describe le problema del incommunicabilitate inter personas qui ha ideas opposite e qui es profundemente convincite que le altere non comprende, e que nos ha le mission de portar le al veritate. Un tema que es sempre actual, e jammais solvite.

Complexivemente, le film es multo agradabile, con multe action, un poco de comicitate, e anque alicun momentos multo toccante emotivemente — benque isto pote esser causate del facto que io, in guardar le film con mi filios, empathisava con illes e projectava super me lor emotiones (o melio: lo que io imaginava esser lor emotiones). Un hora e medie que io non regretta haber passate in le cinema!

Imaginario coming to Windows and MacOS

Good news for the intrepid photographers! Imaginario is now available for Windows and MacOS — in addition to Linux, of course. Don't believe me? Here's a couple of screenshots, then:

Imaginario on Windows

(click on the image to enlarge it)

Imaginario on MacOS

Of course, this does not mean that I'm inviting everyone to start using it: Imaginario is still alpha quality. While it shouldn't just randomly delete your photos, there are many rough edges here and there, so use it with extreme caution.

Still, I'll appreciate if someone having access to these capitalistic operating systems could give a quick try to Imaginario (you can download it from here) and let me know if it starts at all. In case you wish to further explore it, you'll unavodably stumble upon a lot of bugs; you can also let me know about them.

Io attende vostre commentos

Finalmente io ha migrate le sito a un nove systema (appellate Nikola), que promitte facilitate de uso unite a grande possibilitates de integration con altere servicios. Si vos es interessate al detalios technic io vos invita a leger le version anglese de iste pagina (vide le ligamine al summitate), que es multo plus extensive que isto.

discussion by Nicolas Alejandro, on Flickr

Le motivo de iste entrata es principalmente lo de colliger vostre feedback si vos nota alicun cosa qui non functiona, in particular le systema de commentos; a un prime test illo me sembla functionar ben, ma io non vole riscar de guastar le tempore de mi lectores per invitar les a commentar si -- guai! -- illes scribe longissime commentos que post es perdite.

Alora, si vos ha tempore e voluntate, per favor adde un breve commento a iste entrata, e contacta me in un altere maniera si vos trova que isto non functiona.

Cammino quindi penso - 2019-01-25 - Venezuela, Maduro tra forche e altari


Le informazioni che arrivano dal Venezuela dipingono Maduro come un dittatore che affama il suo popolo; altri invece ritengono che lo stia eroicamente difendendo contro l'imperialismo americano. Cercando di sfuggire dalla propaganda del potere, ma anche di non idealizzare un capo di stato che ha grosse responsabilità sulla situazione del suo paese, mi sono imbattuto in questo articolo interessante, scritto da un giornalista che ben conosce il Venezuela: leggilo qui.

Choosing a static site generator

In the last few days I've been writing a simple website for Imaginario. I'm a terrible site designer, and I can't really say that I enjoy writing websites, but it's something that from time to time people might need to do. While the PhotoTeleport website is built with Jekyll, this time I decided to try some other static site generator, in order to figure out if Jekyll is indeed the best for me, or if there are better alternatives for my (rather basic) needs.

I set out trying a couple of Python-based generators, Pelican and Nikola. Here is a brief review of them (and of Jekyll), in case it helps someone else make their own choice.

Jekyll

I've been using it since several months for the PhotoTeleport website, which features a news section and a handful of static pages. It does the job very well and I haven't any major complaint. It's very popular and there are plenty of plugins to customize its behaviour or add new functionality. The documentation is sufficient for a basic usage of the site, and information on how to solve more specific issues can easily be found in the internet.

My only issue is that it's not totally intuitive to use, and in order to customize the interactions for your own needs you need to write your own scripts — at least, I didn't find a ready solution to create a new post, or deploy the generated content into my site.

Pelican

My first impression with Pelican has been extremely positive: it's very easy to setup and start a blog. It's also quite popular, even though not as much as Jekyll, and there are may themes for it. By looking at the themes, though, I quickly realized that Pelican is meant to be used for blogs, and not for simple static sites. I'm almost sure that there must be a way to use it to create a static site, maybe with some tweaking, but I couldn't find information about this in its documentation. A quick search in the internet didn't help either, so I gave up and moved to the next one.

If I had to write a blog I'd certainly consider it, though.

Nikola

Nikola is definitely less popular than Jekyll or Pelican, at least if we trust the number of stars and forks in GitHub, but it's still a popular and maintained project, with many plugins. Like Jekyll, it can handle both blogs and sites, or a combination of the two. It's well documented, the people in the forum are helpful, and its command line interface is simpler and more intuitive than Jekyll's. Also, the live preview functionality seems to be more advanced than Jekyll's, in that the browser is told to automatically reload the page whenever the site is rebuilt.

You can see my progress with the Imaginario website by inspecting the commits in its repository; you'll see how easy it was to set it up, and hopefully following my steps you'll save some time should you decide to create your own site with Nikola.

Overall, I'd rate Jekyll and Nikola on the same level: Jekyll wins for the wider community and amount of available plugins, while Nikola wins for the better command line interactions, and the fact that it's in Python gives me better confidence should I ever need to modify it deeply (though, admittedly, the latter is just a personal preference — Ruby developers will say the opposite).